tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3256879375380353936.post1311468272668844706..comments2024-01-02T18:43:12.325-08:00Comments on Libertarian Intelligence: TNR's Red Carpet Coverage From DenverBrian Holtzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18284822676116941984noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3256879375380353936.post-3458540945005706862023-06-17T12:37:10.981-07:002023-06-17T12:37:10.981-07:00Nice bblog you haveNice bblog you haveAndreahttps://todaymil.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3256879375380353936.post-86969763941901694692008-06-24T13:17:00.000-07:002008-06-24T13:17:00.000-07:00George: I wrote about the innuendo effect on the B...George: I wrote about the innuendo effect on the Barr campaign, not my own viewpoints. Learn to read more discriminatingly. ;-)CarolMooreReporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01814374256334339684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3256879375380353936.post-46233340159272451092008-06-22T12:39:00.000-07:002008-06-22T12:39:00.000-07:00One might propose that you are seeing a press resp...One might propose that you are seeing a press response on how interesting the platform is to most of the press, namely, not very. In addition, this is the third convention in a row in which the platform was completely rewritten, leaving the impression that we change the platform a great deal regularly, so perhaps the platform does not mean much, however much we lovingly worked on its contents.<BR/><BR/>Carol, you keep supporting people in the general line of Mary Ruwart, whose book discusses child pornography in terms of unfortunate childhood decisions, not to mention her theory of criminal justice under which a child pornographer who can pay the assessed financial damages suffers no other penalty, assuming that they did not individually secede first, and people will tend to conclude that we are the party that finds these ideas acceptable for discussion. <BR/><BR/>No, if the radical wing did not want the difficulty you describe, they should have supported a candidate whose position on child pornography--remember, that *is* the question she writes in her book before answering it--did not lead to those problems. But that's what the radical wing did, and we will see the consequences as time unfolds.<BR/><BR/>Having said that, I shall pose both of you a riddle: I am assured by multiple sources that one of the lead people in the effort to persuade Mary Ruwart to run was Pat Dixon, the Texas State Chair, who is most certainly not a radical himself. Why then, assuming these people were told correctly what happened, was he pushing Ruwart as a candidate?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3256879375380353936.post-51824386651472738482008-06-21T06:23:00.000-07:002008-06-21T06:23:00.000-07:00Ever here of the INNUENDO EFFECT? You kept harping...Ever here of the INNUENDO EFFECT? You kept harping on Ruwart's formulations on child pornography, and guess what? All sorts of articles now talk about Barr as being the party of people who almost voted in someone with extreme ideas on child pornography. So now all sorts of people think Barr has similar ideas. Google alert Bob Barr and child pornography and see.CarolMooreReporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01814374256334339684noreply@blogger.com